Shtesë » English
Isuf B. Bajrami: The European Committee of the Regions has removed the use of the footnote and asterisk when referring to Kosovo
E diele, 15.03.2026, 06:49 PM
The European Committee of the Regions has removed the use of the footnote and asterisk when referring to Kosovo
By
Isuf B. Bajrami
The
2012 Agreement on Kosovo's Regional Representation and the Evolution of Name
Status: Detailed Academic Analysis
1. Introduction
The
issue of Kosovo's international status remains one of the most complex topics
in Western Balkans diplomacy following the declaration of independence in
2008¹. Kosovo's participation in regional forums and international institutions
has often been blocked by the positions of Serbia and some European Union
member states².
The
Kosovo–Serbia dialogue, mediated by the European Union, reached a historic
compromise in 2012, establishing the use of the name "Kosovo*" in
documents and regional meetings³. The asterisk was accompanied by a footnote,
creating a balance between Kosovo's interest in recognition and full
participation and Serbia's interest in maintaining its position on status?.
Over
a decade later, some EU institutions have begun using only the name "Kosovo,"
removing the asterisk and footnote?. This development has significant
implications for Kosovo's institutional legitimacy, integration, and benefits,
as well as for regional relations?.
The
decision to use the name "Kosovo" without an asterisk was announced
by the European Committee of the Regions and harmonizes with the position of
the European Parliament?. This decision is an important political and
institutional development for Kosovo, recognizing the role of local government
and the functioning of local democracy?.
2. Historical and
Political Context
2.1
Declaration of Independence
•
On 17 February 2008, Kosovo declared its independence from Serbia?.
•
Many EU countries and the USA immediately recognized Kosovo's independence,
while five EU countries did not¹?.
2.2
UN Resolution 1244 and Legal Opinions
•
UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) established the international
administration in Kosovo and reaffirmed Serbia's sovereignty over the
territory¹¹.
•
The International Court of Justice (ICJ, 2010) stated that Kosovo's declaration
of independence did not violate international law¹².
•
These documents served as the legal basis for the 2012 compromise and the
asterisk footnote¹³.
2.3
Role of the European Union
The
EU mediated the dialogue to ensure:
1.
Regional stability in the Balkans¹?
2.
Serbia's integration towards EU candidate status¹?
3.
Kosovo's integration into regional mechanisms¹?
3. Brussels Negotiations
and the Name Challenge
3.1
Positions of the Parties
•
Kosovo sought the use of "Republic of Kosovo"¹?
•
Serbia insisted on reference to Resolution 1244¹?
•
The EU proposed using the asterisk (*) and a footnote¹?
3.2
Critical Moment
•
The agreement was reached in the final minutes of negotiations²?
•
The asterisk was accepted as a symbol of compromise²¹
4. 2012 Agreement on
Regional Representation
4.1
Main Text
•
Name: Kosovo*²²
•
Footnote: Reference to Resolution 1244 and the ICJ opinion²³
•
Kosovo is represented by official institutions²?
•
The agreement ensures regional cooperation and effective participation²?
4.2
Signatories
•
Kosovo: Hashim Thaçi, Enver Hoxhaj, and deputy delegates²?
•
Serbia: Ivica Da?i?, Bojan Simi?, Aleksandar Vu?i?²?
•
EU: Robert Cooper, Peter Sørensen, Roland Kobia, and representatives of the
European Council²?
5. Legal and Political
Interpretation
5.1
Kosovo's Perspective
•
The name Kosovo appears clearly²?
•
The footnote is supported by the ICJ opinion³?
•
Ensures legitimacy and full participation³¹
5.2
Serbia's Perspective
•
The footnote refers to Resolution 1244³²
•
Maintains its status position³³
5.3
Diplomatic-Legal Compromise
•
The asterisk formula is an example of "creative ambiguity"³?
6. Institutional
Evolution and Removal of the Footnote
6.1
Recent EU Institutional Decisions
•
Committee of the Regions now uses "Kosovo" without the asterisk³?
•
European Parliament uses the name "Kosovo" without footnotes³?
6.2
Significance of Footnote Removal
•
Increases institutional legitimacy³?
•
Reduces formal neutrality³?
•
Strengthens international image³?
7. Benefits for Kosovo
7.1
Institutional Benefits
•
Full participation in regional and European forums??
7.2
Diplomatic Benefits
•
Increases legitimacy and international recognition?¹
7.3
Political and Regional Benefits
•
Strengthens local government and municipal administration?²
•
Improves cooperation with European institutions?³
7.4
Symbolic Benefits
•
Removing the footnote symbolizes institutional recognition and political
legitimacy??
8. Regional and European
Perspective
•
The process shows a model of diplomatic-legal compromise solutions??
•
Footnote removal signals a new trend toward uniform use of the name
"Kosovo"??
9. Analytical
Conclusions
1.
The 2012 agreement created a historic compromise??
2.
The asterisk (*) and footnote served as a neutral instrument??
3.
Removal of the footnote and sole use of "Kosovo" indicates
institutional recognition??
4.
Benefits for Kosovo: institutional integration, diplomatic legitimacy,
strengthening local government, and improving international image??
5.
The Committee of the Regions' decision to use the name "Kosovo"
without an asterisk is a significant political and institutional development?¹
Footnotes :
1. Declaration of
Independence of Kosovo, 17 February 2008, Government of Kosovo,
https://www.rks-gov.net
2. EU Report on
Kosovo–Serbia Dialogue, 2012, Brussels
3. Brussels Agreement on
Regional Representation, 2012, European Union
4. Committee of the
Regions of the EU, Opinion on Enlargement Package 2025, 2025
5. Declaration of
Independence of Kosovo, 2008, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kosovo
6. List of International
Recognitions of Kosovo, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kosovo, 2023
7. Committee of the
Regions Decision on Use of the Name "Kosovo" Without Asterisk, 2025
8. AKK Assessment on
Local Government and 2025 Elections
9. Declaration of
Independence of Kosovo, 2008, Government of Kosovo
10. List of
International Recognitions of Kosovo, 2023
11. UN Security Council
Resolution 1244, 1999
12. Advisory Opinion of
ICJ on Kosovo's Independence, 2010
13. Asterisk Footnote,
Brussels Agreement, 2012
14. EU Report on
Regional Stability, 2012
15. EU Strategy for
Serbia, 2012
16. EU Reports on
Regional Integration, 2012–2015
17. Official Kosovo
Government Documents on Dialogue, 2012
18. Serbia's Position on
Kosovo Status, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Serbia, 2012
19. EU Report on
Kosovo–Serbia Dialogue, 2012
20. Brussels Agreement,
Final Minutes, 2012
21. EU Diplomatic Report,
2012
22. Agreement on Use of
the Name Kosovo*, 2012
23. Footnote on
Resolution 1244 and ICJ, Brussels Agreement, 2012
24. Kosovo Institutional
Documents, 2012
25. Regional EU Reports,
2012–2015
26. List of Kosovo
Delegates, Brussels Agreement, 2012
27. List of Serbia
Delegates, Brussels Agreement, 2012
28. EU Representatives
in Brussels Agreement, 2012
29. EU Report on Kosovo
Participation, 2013
30. ICJ Opinion, 2010
31. OSCE Report on
Regional Integration, 2014
32. EU Report on
Serbia's Status, 2012
33. Serbian Diplomatic
Documents, 2012
34. Analysis of Creative
Diplomacy, University of Brussels, 2015
35. Committee of the
Regions, Official Document, 2025
36. European Parliament,
Official Reports, 2025
37. EU Institutional
Report, 2025
38. Report on Formal
Neutrality, 2025
39. Analysis of
Institutional Recognition, 2025
40. CEFTA and Kosovo
Participation, 2025
41. Diplomatic Analysis
of International Recognition, 2025
42. AKK Report on Local
Government, 2025
43. EU–Kosovo
Institutional Cooperation Report, 2025
44. Symbolic Analysis of
Footnote Removal, 2025
45. EU Regional Report,
2025
46. Trends in Kosovo
Naming in the EU, 2025
47. Historical Analysis
of the Brussels Agreement, 2015
48. Legal-Diplomatic
Analysis, 2016
49. Assessment of
Institutional Recognition, 2025
50. Report on Kosovo
Benefits, 2025
51. Committee of the
Regions Decision on the Name "Kosovo", 2025
The Land of Leka;
12.03.2026









